The Miller-Book Debate
The debate between James P. Miller, of Tampa, Florida, and Morris Butler Book, of Orlando, Florida, is now a matter of history. The debate was held in Orlando, and large crowds were in attendance at each session, about seventy gospel preachers were present, with twenty five of the "Christian Church." Fine order prevailed throughout and we believe much good was done. We have already received reports of some members of the Christian Church who have stated that they are now convinced that the use of mechanical instruments of music is wrong. The Reformed Presbyterian Church, which does not use instrumental music, attended in a body, and expressed interest in meeting with our brethren for further study of the divine pattern.
Mr. Book affirmed the following proposition: "Resolved, that the scriptures are sufficiently clear that any person of normal intelligence can see that certain mechanical instruments of music are both permitted and required in the praise of God." Throughout the entire discussion Brother Miller kept pleading with Mr. Book to show him the scripture so he could see it. Book found instrumental music in the law and harps in heaven, but he could never find either in the church. He was never allowed to forget that it took the word of God to enable him to know that they had instrumental music under the law; and it took the word of God for him to know that there were harps in heaven; therefore, it can take no less than the word of God to enable one to know that they are to be used in the New Testament church. Then he was repeatedly challenged to give the passage which teaches it. This point was made to stand out so forcefully that none who attended the debate will ever forget it. Some may not accept it but they will never forget it. We believe the debate was a great victory for truth.
Mr. Book is the son of W. H. Book who delivered the Columbus Tabernacle Sermons. Like his father he is rather oratorical. He has a good choice of words and an easy flow of language that make him a most pleasing speaker with great audience appeal. But he seemed unable to develop a logically arranged argument. His statements, though using the scripture commonly employed by his people, were more general than argumentative in form. He followed a prepared manuscript throughout the entire discussion and refused to be drawn away from it. Seldom did he attempt to reply to any negative material presented by Brother Miller.
Brother Miller is an excellent debater. His knowledge of the scripture, logical analysis of an argument, and oratorical force make him a powerful antagonist in the polemic arena. His keen wit, good humor and genial smile enable him to keep the audience in a pleasant and receptive frame of mind. It was my privilege to moderate for him in this debate, and I can truly say that brethren need have no fear of the Truth suffering in the hands of James P. Miller. It is hoped that many more debates like this one may be held. Truth is sure to triumph.